Subscribe via E-mail

Your email:

Follow Matheson!

Who Are We?

Occ Rehab Photos

Functional Testing Equip.

Matheson Philosophy on Workplace Safety and Work Injury Evaluation

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Q & A: How Does A Certification Designation Help In Court?

  
  
  
  

A former student recently contacted Roy and asked a question regarding the importance of the Certified Ergonomic Evaluation Specialist (CEES) and Certified Work Capacity Evaluator (CWCE) designations, and how these statuses would stand up in court.

Student's Question

Why should one seek certification? How do the CEES/CWCE designations hold up “better” in court?

Roy's Answer

My comments are focused on how the U.S. system works, as that is my area of study. To apply these same thoughts to Canada all one has to do is look at the B.C. system. There are dozens of B.C. Supreme Court cases that deal with the same issue. Search the court online system for names like "Kyi", "Enright", "Fischer", "Kerr" or "Forstved v. Penner".

Each of the above names will bring examples of cases where a CWCE designee has been qualified as an expert by the presiding judge. The last case, Forstved, is an example of an evaluator who was disqualified as an expert. In fact, this is an example of a good way to ruin one's career.

The certifications are foundational to be qualified under Federal Rule of Evidence 702. This updated Rule replaces all precedent set by Daubert v Dow Chemical. It reads:

“If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case.”

Recognized certifications assist an evaluator to meet seven of the standards one has to meet to be qualified as an expert. Keep in mind that it is the individual who is qualified, not the "system" of evaluation. Read Baker v Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Social Security Commissioner,  No. 05-3106 for an example of how the expert's opinion is valued by the court, not the system of evaluation.

The value of our certification is that it recognizes your knowledge, skill, experience, training, and education which we believe will result in your ability to provide testimony based upon sufficient facts or data gathered using reliable principles and methods applied reliably to the facts of the case.

 

Do any of you have experiences you would like to share where your CWCE/CEES designation helped you in a legal situation? Share your stories below!

 

Roy Matheson

  not-certified-yetclic


Stay in touch with us on:

Comments

Wow, the not certified yet link is broke. Bummer, you got me looking but I couldn't take the bait. I have been doing Matheson FCE's for years but not cwce. Is there a way for someone to become certified without doing the whole course? Thanks!
Posted @ Tuesday, March 06, 2012 12:54 PM by Patrick
Thanks for your interest in certification! The following link will take you to the certification page of our new website! http://www.roymatheson.com/training/certification 
 
Check out the CWCE application policies at this link!  
http://www.roymatheson.com/training/certification/cwce-cfce 
 
If you are interested in more information feel free to contact us! 
http://www.roymatheson.com/contact-us
Posted @ Tuesday, March 06, 2012 3:01 PM by Matheson
I am a PT, I spend most of my time doing ergonomics consulting for large industrial facilities. The court cases above are an interesting take on a theme I have discussed with some ergonomics consulting groups; should non-BCPE certified individuals be marketing themselves as ergonomics consultants? Technically there exist acrediting bodies to protect the consumer from individuals who do not have the sufficient expertise to offer certain services. Case in point, to practice PT you need to get a license. This sets a minimum skill level that is required. In the world of ergonomics, however, people of highly variable skill levels perform assessment at highly variable levels of quality. If no one draws a line in the sand and says that one must be a CEP or even some of these other "boutique certifications" (not my word for them) then the consumer does not know who is qualified and who is a quack. 
So, court cases aside, in the interest of the small businesses who may not have the sophisticated personnel to know the difference, we need to have some solid bar set to say "you are or are not in the ergonomics world," just as you are or are not a CPA or a nurse, etc.
Posted @ Sunday, April 15, 2012 6:13 AM by chris studebaker
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics